This is a blog to discuss philosophy, chess, politics, C. S. Lewis, or whatever it is that I'm in the mood to discuss.
Russell argues for a type of consequentialism (and not his finest writing). Not the same as "moral" objectivity.
Didn't the early Russell agree with G.E. Moore's position re: the simple non-natural character of Good?
Post a Comment
2 comments:
Russell argues for a type of consequentialism (and not his finest writing). Not the same as "moral" objectivity.
Didn't the early Russell agree with G.E. Moore's position re: the simple non-natural character of Good?
Post a Comment