tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post270317329964850485..comments2024-03-28T12:34:14.649-07:00Comments on dangerous idea: Bertrand Russell: Moral ObjectivistVictor Repperthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-13824531741498163622009-03-14T11:02:00.000-07:002009-03-14T11:02:00.000-07:00Didn't the early Russell agree with G.E. Moore's p...Didn't the early Russell agree with G.E. Moore's position re: the simple non-natural character of Good?Gordon Knighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03223834584232283601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-81658575343216436462009-03-14T07:53:00.000-07:002009-03-14T07:53:00.000-07:00Russell argues for a type of consequentialism (and...Russell argues for a type of consequentialism (and not his finest writing). Not the same as "moral" objectivity.Perezosohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01875109580933192779noreply@blogger.com