Saturday, January 08, 2011
Less Wrong on the McGrews' Essay
Luke, at Common Sense Atheism, thinks that the these criticisms of the McGrews' Essay are more substantial than those put forward by Carrier.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I don't think he thinks that they *are* more substantial; rather, I think he hopes they'll be better than Carrier's.
I got as far as the chap who thinks that the Gospels were written 100's of years after the event...why bother with this junk?
Graham
What do you mean Mr. Veale? No one, as far as I can see, says that the gospels were written hundreds of years after the event.
KBrowne
Yip, you're right K Browne. My bad. Note to self: stop reading blogs when grumpy!
Graham
Okay, having read in a fairer mood, I'm still underwhelmed. But this post
http://lesswrong.com/lw/3m6/techniques_for_probability_estimates/#more
looks better, given the "you should only use Bayes for statistics" objection repeatedly used on the internet.
Graham
I'll break the address up, in case any one is interested in having a look.
http://lesswrong.com/lw/3m6/
techniques_for_probability
_estimates/#more
Post a Comment