Less Wrong on the McGrews' Essay
Luke, at Common Sense Atheism, thinks that the these criticisms of the McGrews' Essay are more substantial than those put forward by Carrier.
Labels: Lydia McGrew, miracles, Richard Carrier, Tim McGrew
posted by Victor Reppert @ 11:33 AM
6 Comments:
At January 08, 2011 1:29 PM ,
Bobcat said...
I don't think he thinks that they *are* more substantial; rather, I think he hopes they'll be better than Carrier's.
At January 08, 2011 1:47 PM ,
Mr Veale said...
I got as far as the chap who thinks that the Gospels were written 100's of years after the event...why bother with this junk?
Graham
At January 09, 2011 3:14 AM ,
kbrowne said...
What do you mean Mr. Veale? No one, as far as I can see, says that the gospels were written hundreds of years after the event.
At January 09, 2011 11:25 AM ,
Mr Veale said...
KBrowne
Yip, you're right K Browne. My bad. Note to self: stop reading blogs when grumpy!
Graham
At January 09, 2011 11:42 AM ,
Mr Veale said...
Okay, having read in a fairer mood, I'm still underwhelmed. But this post
http://lesswrong.com/lw/3m6/techniques_for_probability_estimates/#more
looks better, given the "you should only use Bayes for statistics" objection repeatedly used on the internet.
Graham
At January 09, 2011 11:44 AM ,
Mr Veale said...
I'll break the address up, in case any one is interested in having a look.
http://lesswrong.com/lw/3m6/
techniques_for_probability
_estimates/#more
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home