This is a blog to discuss philosophy, chess, politics, C. S. Lewis, or whatever it is that I'm in the mood to discuss.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Bulverism: A Truly Democratic Game
I find the fruits of his discovery almost everywhere. Thus I see my
religion dismissed on the grounds that “the comfortable parson had every
reason for assuring the nineteenth century worker that poverty would be
rewarded in another world.” Well, no doubt he had. On the assumption
that Christianity is an error, I can see clearly enough that some people
would still have a motive for inculcating it. I see it so easily that I
can, of course, play the game the other way round, by saying that “the
modern man has every reason for trying to convince himself that there
are no eternal sanctions behind the morality he is rejecting.” For
Bulverism is a truly democratic game in the sense that all can play it
all day long, and that it give no unfair advantage to the small and
offensive minority who reason. But of course it gets us not one inch
nearer to deciding whether, as a matter of fact, the Christian religion
is true or false. That question remains to be discussed on quite
different grounds – a matter of philosophical and historical argument.
However it were decided, the improper motives of some people, both for
believing it and for disbelieving it, would remain just as they are.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I agree that Bulverism is a fallacy.
However, because Christianity seems to me so obviously bollocks, I cannot help but speculate about what motivates otherwise intelligent people to believe such infantile nonsense.
But of course those motivations do not make Christianity false.
Post a Comment