Six arguments for legalizing murder
What does this tell us about arguments?
1. Some people, like O. J. Simpson, are able to find good enough lawyers to get them acquitted if they commit a murder. This is an economic injustice which needs to be rectified. So murder should be legalized so that everyone, rich or poor, can knock people off without being punished.
2. The illegality of murder means that people are depending on the government, instead of on themselves, to protect their lives. Such government dependence is a bad thing, and would be eliminated if murder were legalized.
3. The unborn, since Roe. V. Wade, can be murdered at will. But protecting the lives of people after they are born is birth discrimination. Therefore, murder should be legalized.
4. “Thou shalt not kill” is a religious commandment, and to enforce it as law it to impose religion on the public. Since church and state should be separate, and the imposition of religion by government is unconstitutional, murder should be legalized.
5. Government’s protection of people’s lives, instead of letting those who allow themselves to be murdered to die, weakens the gene pool. So we should legalize murder and let natural selection do its job.
6. The anti-natalist philosopher David Benatar has argued that it is better for people if they were never born. Legalizing murder will allow people to improve the lives of the victims.
1. Some people, like O. J. Simpson, are able to find good enough lawyers to get them acquitted if they commit a murder. This is an economic injustice which needs to be rectified. So murder should be legalized so that everyone, rich or poor, can knock people off without being punished.
2. The illegality of murder means that people are depending on the government, instead of on themselves, to protect their lives. Such government dependence is a bad thing, and would be eliminated if murder were legalized.
3. The unborn, since Roe. V. Wade, can be murdered at will. But protecting the lives of people after they are born is birth discrimination. Therefore, murder should be legalized.
4. “Thou shalt not kill” is a religious commandment, and to enforce it as law it to impose religion on the public. Since church and state should be separate, and the imposition of religion by government is unconstitutional, murder should be legalized.
5. Government’s protection of people’s lives, instead of letting those who allow themselves to be murdered to die, weakens the gene pool. So we should legalize murder and let natural selection do its job.
6. The anti-natalist philosopher David Benatar has argued that it is better for people if they were never born. Legalizing murder will allow people to improve the lives of the victims.
Labels: arguments


7 Comments:
At May 17, 2010 10:29 PM ,
Mark Frank said...
Excellent post. It tells me that we should follow Hume and let the passions guide our morals rather than rely on principles to tell us. Moral principles should be inductive not deductive.
At May 18, 2010 7:08 AM ,
Shackleman said...
What should we do with arguments like these? We should take them at their word. Agree. And then shoot them. If they survive, I'm certain they will argue it was wrong to try to murder them.
I jest of course. But only sort of.
At May 18, 2010 7:36 AM ,
Ergo Latin said...
1. The Menendez brothers were not aquitted.
2. Government doesn't protect civilians except by detterents because law is there only for after the fact of murder. The government-through the Secret Service--protects only the president. Other high profile persons have always had to protect themselves either by arming themselves, hiring body guards or buiding a reputation of psychological fear (God or the Mafia, for example).
3. The unborn, by definition, cannot be murdered.
4. Killing and murder are two different issues. Murder includes killing but killing does not necessarily mean murder.
5. A sharp-shooter can fire a rifle a mile away and hit his targetted victim. Unless the future depends on cowardly acts then the gene pool has created by natural selection the illegalization of murder.
6. This is true except at the very end of the murder of all inhabitants on Earth there will be the last murderer standing.
And then suicide, not murder, must be considered.
At May 18, 2010 9:02 AM ,
Anonymous said...
Similar logic put in video format. "Cruel Logic"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qd1LPRJLnI
At May 18, 2010 1:22 PM ,
J said...
Doc Reppert's sounding rather sensible for a change.
At May 18, 2010 6:07 PM ,
Mark said...
Benatar tries to distinguish between "lives worth starting" and "lives worth continuing" in order to avoid having to say that killing people is good for them.
At May 18, 2010 8:46 PM ,
Joshua Allen said...
7. Laws exist to protect victims. Someone who is dead does not feel any pain or raise any complaints in court, so there is no harm done to him or her. Thus, murder should be legal.
8. Some people are a net drag on society, and have very little chance of becoming productive. Killing them would be best for society.
I used to have a bunch more...
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home