Do no miracles today imply none then?
Not according to this response to Carrier.
Labels: contemporary miracles, miracles
posted by Victor Reppert @ 2:58 PM
About Me
- Name: Victor Reppert
- Location: Glendale, Arizona, United States
I am the author of C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason, published by Inter-Varsity Press. I received a Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1989.
Previous Posts
- Elliot Sober reviews Hume's Abject Failure
- J. P. Holding on Hume on Miracles
- I'm not dead yet!
- C. S. Lewis on "uniform experience" against miracl...
- Teddy Roosevelt for philosophers
- A Critique of Alston's Claim that We Perceive God
- A New Book on Hitler and Christianity
- An exchange on Hume on Miracles
- Is Icelandic Elf-belief properly basic
- Bill Craig is debating Hitchens
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
2 Comments:
At March 09, 2009 11:25 AM ,
Andrew T. said...
I wonder if Amy Sayers (the author of the piece) believes that Joseph Smith found golden plates and magical spectacles buried in upstate New York in 1823?
At March 09, 2009 1:02 PM ,
Nathaniel said...
Carrier's argument is very crude indeed -- not the worst argument on the subject that I've seen, but the competition at the bottom is very fierce. Sayers's critique could be better written, but she is clearly right on the main points.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home