Bahansen is so much better than he is represented as being by his followers on message boards, including Matt Slick. Stine may be the Matt Slick of atheism. One concept he needs to know, direct clash. He sort of argues against his own private concept of apologists rather than the apologist he's facing at the moment. That is to say in addition to begging the question he' also into strawman arguments,
There is a hell of a lot more to atheism than just saying God arguments are unproved. I think we all know that. Out of respect for friends at Sec Outpost I think I'm uncomfortable with Bahnsen throwing out phrases like "the atheist world view."
3 comments:
Bahansen is so much better than he is represented as being by his followers on message boards, including Matt Slick. Stine may be the Matt Slick of atheism. One concept he needs to know, direct clash. He sort of argues against his own private concept of apologists rather than the apologist he's facing at the moment. That is to say in addition to begging the question he' also into strawman arguments,
There is a hell of a lot more to atheism than just saying God arguments are unproved. I think we all know that. Out of respect for friends at Sec Outpost I think I'm uncomfortable with Bahnsen throwing out phrases like "the atheist world view."
My analysis of Bahnsen's opening statement: https://youtu.be/tMlm0Ehz1ZU
Post a Comment