"you've had your ass handed to you so many times it's not even amusing more - merely sad. And Skep has been exposed as a complete moron here, to any onlooker."
Any onlooker here, if he is honest, would see that you don't admit defeat ... whether is is because you aren't bright enough to understand that your claims have been refuted, or because of your sheer dishonesty. I think it's both.
Any onlooker here, if he is honest, would see that you don't admit defeat
Skeppy - Grod, RD, myself and others have all corrected you, pointed out you were wrong, provided evidence after evidence you were wrong - and I even stepped up and /contacted Behe directly/, who also pointed out how you were wrong.
"Derp. IC means something can't develop gradually, even with an intelligent agent involved!" No, Skeppy, it doesn't.
"Derp. ID has nothing to say about the OOL! It has to do with evolution and IC stuff!" And ID infers that the OoL would have had to have been IC.
"Derp. Okay but Meyer's book is all about the supernatural! It's a creationist book!" No, Skeppy - it's not. Here's quotes straight from the book showing as much.
I didn't 'admit defeat', Im-Derpy, because on this point? I haven't been defeated. You have. You've had your face bashed off the intellectual turnstyle, repeatedly. And now you're sitting there, metaphorical nose bloodied, metaphorical panties soiled, whimpering, 'But I won! I *won*! Why does no one believe me!?'
Well, it's because you didn't. You just made everyone look at you and go, "This is what Cult of Gnu atheism has to offer? It may well be making atheists more stupid."
202 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 202 of 202"you've had your ass handed to you so many times it's not even amusing more - merely sad. And Skep has been exposed as a complete moron here, to any onlooker."
Any onlooker here, if he is honest, would see that you don't admit defeat ... whether is is because you aren't bright enough to understand that your claims have been refuted, or because of your sheer dishonesty. I think it's both.
Any onlooker here, if he is honest, would see that you don't admit defeat
Skeppy - Grod, RD, myself and others have all corrected you, pointed out you were wrong, provided evidence after evidence you were wrong - and I even stepped up and /contacted Behe directly/, who also pointed out how you were wrong.
"Derp. IC means something can't develop gradually, even with an intelligent agent involved!" No, Skeppy, it doesn't.
"Derp. ID has nothing to say about the OOL! It has to do with evolution and IC stuff!" And ID infers that the OoL would have had to have been IC.
"Derp. Okay but Meyer's book is all about the supernatural! It's a creationist book!" No, Skeppy - it's not. Here's quotes straight from the book showing as much.
I didn't 'admit defeat', Im-Derpy, because on this point? I haven't been defeated. You have. You've had your face bashed off the intellectual turnstyle, repeatedly. And now you're sitting there, metaphorical nose bloodied, metaphorical panties soiled, whimpering, 'But I won! I *won*! Why does no one believe me!?'
Well, it's because you didn't. You just made everyone look at you and go, "This is what Cult of Gnu atheism has to offer? It may well be making atheists more stupid."
Thanks for that. ;)
Post a Comment