•Ethics:
The Multicultural Approach
•How
moral issues arise in our culture
•“We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and are
endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these
rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
•Perhaps
no statement captures the moral consciousness of our country. On the one hand,
human equality is a powerful idea. On the other hand, the author of those words
owned slaves, nor was he particularly known for treating women as equals.
•Moral
debates in America
•A
lot of moral issues arise in America in an attempt to apply the concept of
equality. Consider the issue of slavery, which ripped the country in half in
the 19th Century. Or consider the women’s
suffrage movement, the civil rights movement, the feminist movement, and even
the gay rights movement. The idea in all of these movements is that people
shouldn’t be treated as inferiors because of differences that are not morally
relevant, or for differences that are not under the person’s control.
•Equality
and multiculturalism
•Our
belief in equality is perhaps one of the most significant motivation for
looking at things multiculturally. If
people are equal, then we might want to avoid treating people or ideas as
inferior if they came from some culture other than our own.
•Blum’s
motives for multicultural educaton
•Lawrence
Blum mentions three values motivating a multicultural approach: antiracism, a
sense of interracial community, and treating persons as individuals.
•These
values are more common in our own culture than they are in many others. In many
other countries race (and gender) is a basis for treating others as inferior,
there is no interracial community, and people are not treated as individuals.
•Arranged
marriages and female genital mutilation
•Something
that reflects the individualism of our own society is the fact that we select
our own mates. We do not countenance the idea, for example, of being given in
marriage by one’s parents. But in some cultures not only are marriages are
arranged, but people are forced into them as children. Similarly, in some
cultures women are forced into genital mutilation, which is the subject of
Martha Nussbaum’s essay.
•The
value of tolerance
We value tolerance in our culture quite a
bit. I think historically we found ourselves having to live in a democratic
society with many different religious standpoints, so we needed tolerance to
get along with one another.
One idea that people think will encourage
tolerance is the idea of relativism. If morals are relative, and there is no
truth about what is really right or wrong, then we will be less inclined to be
judgmental toward others.
•Or
will it?
•One
surprising result is that if relativism is true, then it is a virtue to be
tolerant of other cultures just in case your culture approves of tolerating
other cultures. If it doesn't, then you are supposed to be intolerant. So
relativism doesn't lead to tolerance, it can just as easily lead to intolerance.
•Dealing
with other cultures
•How
should we respond to things going on in other cultures. One side of us wants to
say that we shouldn’t be critical of what other cultures do. On the other hand,
sometimes in other societies we find that some people are treated as inferiors,
and what we would consider to be their rights are violated. So, how do we
respond to that?
•The
paradox of multiculturalism
•The
paradox of multiculturalism is the fact that the values that drive us toward
multiculturalism are exactly those values that are rejected in other cultures.
•For
example, we have a conviction that people should be treated as equals,
regardless of their origin or background. Otherwise we could look at other
cultures and just say “those barbarians.” But other cultures often approve of
treating certain peoples as inferiors.
•Examples:
•The
Caste system in India
•Prohibiting
women from driving in Saudi Arabia
•Arranged
marriages, and even child marriages, in India and other countries.
•Anti-gay
laws in Kenya and Uganda: Both male and female homosexual activity is
illegal. Under the Penal
Code,
"carnal knowledge against the order of nature" between two males
carries a potential penalty of life imprisonment and executions/torture are
allowed with no legal liabilities for the executioners.”
•Criminal
punishment for rape victims in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Ireland, Somalia, and
India. http://shariaunveiled.wordpress.com/2013/08/07/5-countries-that-respond-to-rape-victims-by-throwing-them-in-prison/
•Executing
people for adultery in places like Afghanistan
•Female
Genital Mutilation
•The
Good Old USA
•Well,
we had slavery until the Civil War, and women got the right to vote in the
1920s, which means that during most of our country’s history, women have NOT
had this right. The civil rights movement culminated in the 1960s, in my
lifetime.
•Two
ways of responding
1)It’s their culture. Who’s to say what’s
right or wrong
2)People’s rights are being unjustly
violated. It’s wrong no matter whether the culture approves or not.
It comes down to the whole issue of moral
objectivity.
•
3 comments:
Excellent food for thought. Thanks.
Concerning "multiculturalism" and "slavery in the USA" --
The institution of slavery in the Colonies (in thus in the USA) is, in fact, an instance of "multiculturalism", a I discuss here and here
In a world of multicultural relative morality, the culture with the biggest army or economic clout gets to decide.
Post a Comment