Thanks. And... it's just a ridiculously lame rant of a piece. 'Oh sure, those 47%? Well, they include the elderly and some college graduates. It's not that bad!'
And he seems to equate claims of 'creeping socialism' with 'wealth concentration'. It's ridiculous to start with, but gets worse since his own metric has wealth concentration lowering - but that's okay, because he's pretty sure it's temporary.
Silly article, there's not much to it. Get some Ralph Nader in here.
3 comments:
Link isn't working.
I fixed it.
Thanks. And... it's just a ridiculously lame rant of a piece. 'Oh sure, those 47%? Well, they include the elderly and some college graduates. It's not that bad!'
And he seems to equate claims of 'creeping socialism' with 'wealth concentration'. It's ridiculous to start with, but gets worse since his own metric has wealth concentration lowering - but that's okay, because he's pretty sure it's temporary.
Silly article, there's not much to it. Get some Ralph Nader in here.
Post a Comment