From Internet Infidels Discussion Board
Johan wrote: The problem is that the plausible-sounding-ness of this line of thought is dependent on selective omission of evidence (or, if you are a professional apologist like Plantinga or Reppert, willful ignorance of evidence coupled with the intent to withhold this fact from the flock).
Being put in the same sentence with Al Plantinga more than makes up for getting bashed!
2 comments:
Congratulations!
Let me be the second to congratulate you!
Post a Comment