What is truly difficult is to distinguish between evil and insanity (or, if you will, mental illness). Is a pedophile evil, or simply mentally ill? Same question goes for a serial killer. Or John Hinkley. Or our former, loser president. Is malignant narcissism evil, or a disease?
One could make a case for Der Fuhrer being stark raving bonkers, whereas Himmler, Goebbels, and Goering were purely and simply evil.
I think a lot of people who want to keep the abortion industry going use things like the "wokeism" to distract from the reality of abortion practices. Waste your outrage on racism (while telling us at the same time that races are not real) and while you are spun up on all that, babies are being butchered. 60 minutes used to do undercover reporting on all sorts of industries. The abortion industry has quite noticeably been excluded.
I wonder if the outsized and phoney outrage regarding Trump is also part of the strategy. The first president who had the opportunity to drive a stake into the heart of Roe v Wade and the harpies went nuts.
I've never seen such Looney-Tunes-ish fake outrage at Trump in my lifetime. Not even close.
He's being accused of being incompetent and insane yet a mastermind that is capable of somehow becoming an omnipotent dictator. I get it that they don't like his mean tweets, but the livid hatred can only be explained by their fear he is taking away the thing most sacred to them. Their sacrafice to Moloch.
And you should know. Anyone who defends our former, loser president has got to be deep into satan's back pocket. The stench ought to be pretty strong there.
It is also wrong to fail to oppose intrinsic evil. So if one doesn't vote against the guy that vows to start WWIII because the other guy wants to give "tax breaks to the wealthy" your failure to act is enabling WWIII.
That is the essence of the canard of the "single issue voter".
"Look at all the goodies Candidate A is promising to deliver if I vote for him. Candidate B want mean things like fiscal responsibility, tough of crime etc.....What? Candidate A wants to kill millions? What are you some kind of single issue voter?"
It's possible for people of good will to disagree about the best way to achieve what is good for society. They can be correct in their assessment to acheive those goals or incorrect.
What is morally wrong however, is to knowingly participate in intrinsically evil acts even if one mistakenly sees it as a means for good ends. It is a also a lie to claim that intrinsically evil acts are morally equivalent to any other prudential decisions to reach what one thinks are good ends.
The satanic part comes in with the attempted distractions, gaslighting, and denial of the evil being done as well as claims of hopelessness of opposing the evil.
It's easy to hit a hole in one when you cheat, which our former loser president has verifiably done in golf, on multiple occasions too numerous to count.
225 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 225 of 225What is truly difficult is to distinguish between evil and insanity (or, if you will, mental illness). Is a pedophile evil, or simply mentally ill? Same question goes for a serial killer. Or John Hinkley. Or our former, loser president. Is malignant narcissism evil, or a disease?
One could make a case for Der Fuhrer being stark raving bonkers, whereas Himmler, Goebbels, and Goering were purely and simply evil.
I think a lot of people who want to keep the abortion industry going use things like the "wokeism" to distract from the reality of abortion practices. Waste your outrage on racism (while telling us at the same time that races are not real) and while you are spun up on all that, babies are being butchered. 60 minutes used to do undercover reporting on all sorts of industries. The abortion industry has quite noticeably been excluded.
The evil will attempt to defend all this.
I wonder if the outsized and phoney outrage regarding Trump is also part of the strategy. The first president who had the opportunity to drive a stake into the heart of Roe v Wade and the harpies went nuts.
Nah... Not everyone is as pathologically obsessed with that one issue as you are. There were reasons enough to loathe our previous president.
Ever so often the mask falls.
... and the Phantom of the Opera is revealed!
I'm comfortable with my theory.
I've never seen such Looney-Tunes-ish fake outrage at Trump in my lifetime. Not even close.
He's being accused of being incompetent and insane yet a mastermind that is capable of somehow becoming an omnipotent dictator. I get it that they don't like his mean tweets, but the livid hatred can only be explained by their fear he is taking away the thing most sacred to them. Their sacrafice to Moloch.
People of good will just don't behave that way.
And anyone pointing out the murder of children in the millions has a mental issue.
Smells satanic.
"smells satanic"
And you should know. Anyone who defends our former, loser president has got to be deep into satan's back pocket. The stench ought to be pretty strong there.
Thanks for illustrating my point.
Anyone who votes for either party has done Satan's work for him.
Did I win?
Nope.
It is also wrong to fail to oppose intrinsic evil. So if one doesn't vote against the guy that vows to start WWIII because the other guy wants to give "tax breaks to the wealthy" your failure to act is enabling WWIII.
Not all policies have equal moral weight.
That is the essence of the canard of the "single issue voter".
"Look at all the goodies Candidate A is promising to deliver if I vote for him. Candidate B want mean things like fiscal responsibility, tough of crime etc.....What? Candidate A wants to kill millions? What are you some kind of single issue voter?"
To be clear.
It's possible for people of good will to disagree about the best way to achieve what is good for society. They can be correct in their assessment to acheive those goals or incorrect.
What is morally wrong however, is to knowingly participate in intrinsically evil acts even if one mistakenly sees it as a means for good ends. It is a also a lie to claim that intrinsically evil acts are morally equivalent to any other prudential decisions to reach what one thinks are good ends.
The satanic part comes in with the attempted distractions, gaslighting, and denial of the evil being done as well as claims of hopelessness of opposing the evil.
Trump doesn't like people who brag. Even though he can hit a hole in one at an advanced age.
It's easy to hit a hole in one when you cheat, which our former loser president has verifiably done in golf, on multiple occasions too numerous to count.
People are just jealous of his natural athleticism, good looks and very stable geniusness.
By those criteria, JFK was our greatest president ever!
Never hit a hole in one.
But he too had an orange face.
And was definitely a cheater.
"Never hit a hole in one."
And neither did your guy.
Greatest president of all time.
Will be the greatest Speaker of the House next.
Then greatest president again.
Post a Comment