Nagel’s persistent
tendency to generate headaches for philosophical naturalists began with his
essay “What Is it Like to Be a Bat?” in 1974. In that essay he argues that any
third-person perspective on a person, such as might be provided by natural
science, invariably leaves out the first-person perspective of that
person. This is an argument that was
prefigured in C. S. Lewis’s essay “Meditation in a Toolshed,” in which he
distinguished between “looking at” and “looking along,” and claimed that a
systematic preference of “looking at” as opposed to “looking along,” breaks
down when it comes to considering our own thinking, and consistently applied it
would give us nothing to think about.
No comments:
Post a Comment