Thursday, January 03, 2013

Chris Hallquist critiques Feser's defense of Aristotle's Metaphysics

Here.

5 comments:

BenYachov said...

Hallquist is a Hack. You might as well cite Kirk Cameron's critique
of evolution.


http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-incompetent-hack.html

http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2012/03/unliterate-hallq.html

BenYachov said...

Read Hallquist's comments box.

Ali is back. He is this Muslim dude who is a fan of TLS who I've seen before defend Feser's natural theology against Gnu critics.

It won't end well for Hallquist.

Meltdown in 5...4...3...2...

Papalinton said...

This critique was 4 years ago.

BenYachov said...



Hallquist hasn't improved since then.

B.L.T. said...

I always viewed Parmenides argument as more sophisticated than how Hallquist portrays it. It seems like Parmenides was arguing that even if an event has a cause, it would still involve something coming from nothing. If I move my hand I am making a state of my hand that did not exist before. In one moment my hand was not at point B, in the next it was.

http://skepticalphilosopher.blogspot.com/2008/08/parmenides-refutation-of-change.html