Here. I would like to ask someone who believes
1) That extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
2) The apparent fine-tuning of the universe can be explained in terms of a multiverse as opposed to God
how in the world they reconcile those two commitments. A few years ago, I did a couple of posts entitled "Arguments that don't mix," and it seems to me to be pretty evident that this pair of responses belongs to that category. Why are we told that the existence of a multiverse is NOT a claim that requires extraordinary evidence, but the existence of a universe finely tuned for intelligent life, or that Jesus rose from the dead, does require extraordinary evidence.