I actually like this. But of course, I would include stuff like intentionality, truth, mental causation, the psychological relevance of logical laws, identity of a thinker through time, and the reliability of our rational faculties.
I would be interested in your evaluation of the evidence you listed. It is easy enough to set up the analysis using Google spreadsheets (there is only one brief formula needed). Then you could provide a link so everyone could see your assigned assessments and the resulting probability.
Since the central claim of Christianity is historical, thus subject to an inductive proof. I think this methodology is even better suited to evaluating the plausibility of the resurrection.
1 comment:
I would be interested in your evaluation of the evidence you listed. It is easy enough to set up the analysis using Google spreadsheets (there is only one brief formula needed). Then you could provide a link so everyone could see your assigned assessments and the resulting probability.
Since the central claim of Christianity is historical, thus subject to an inductive proof. I think this methodology is even better suited to evaluating the plausibility of the resurrection.
Post a Comment