dangerous idea

This is a blog to discuss philosophy, chess, politics, C. S. Lewis, or whatever it is that I'm in the mood to discuss.

Friday, August 18, 2017

Does secularism make you more tolerant?

›
Maybe not. Mr. Beinart, thanks so much for being with us. Thank you. We often tie secularism to young people and to tolerance. Is that mi...
2 comments:
Thursday, August 17, 2017

On ulterior motives, or Ezekiel Bulver rides again

›
Someone on Secular Outpost tried to explain away my arguments by saying I was just looking for reasons to hold onto my religion. I called t...
3 comments:

Angus Menuge responds to Keith Parsons

›
This part is incomprehensible to me: It is not the abstract propositional content of, say, the statement of modus tollens that constrains ...
1 comment:

More dialogue with Keith Parsons

›
KP: My claim is that the realization (cognitive sense) of, say, the cogency of Draper's argument, is realized (non-cognitive sense) in t...
Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Mental causation and a famous football play

›
What does it mean to say that you were persuaded by the argument from evil that God does not exist? Let us say, at one point, that you beli...
9 comments:
Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Can everyone now see that the issues surrounding Donald Trump are NOT right-left issues

›
People who follow politics are inclined to think that any and all issues are a matter of whether you are left or right. If you are left, you...
27 comments:

A Christian critique of Thomas Nagel

›
Here , by David Baggett.
Monday, August 14, 2017

Horgan on non-reductive materialism

›
Terence Horgan was one of the developers of supervenience theory as a way of developing a nonreductive materialist theory. I read his writin...

How does a psychological event occur?

›
SP: -You passed over the nature of the psychological event. How does a psychological event occur? A psychological event is a brain process, ...
9 comments:
Sunday, August 13, 2017

›
An interesting essay on supervenience by Lynch and Glasgow .

Problems for emergent properties

›
Emergent properties are deeply problematic. They either are reducible to physical states or they supervene on physical states. Is there a pa...
5 comments:

Slagle on abortion and straw men

›
Jim Slagle on abortion and the straw man fallacy. Here. 
2 comments:
Friday, August 11, 2017

It doesn't add up: A Reply to Keith Parsons

›
KP: Thanks for your patience. You have been over this territory many times before, I am sure, but something basic is dividing us, and, with...
43 comments:
Thursday, August 10, 2017

Surely you're joking

›
Dear Dr. Craig I am writing you because I am quite in desperation. The church in which I have been a member all of my life has turned int...
15 comments:

Defining the mental out of the physical

›
First, when people try to define the physical, they do it, in part, by conceiving the mental and then saying that what is basic to the univ...
8 comments:

The metaphysics of morals

›
The Bible is primarily about salvation history, the idea that it God loves us, that nevertheless we are very very flawed because our wills ...
1 comment:
Wednesday, August 09, 2017

Which laws govern the thoughts of a material thinker

›
I'm not begging the question when I say mental acts cannot be physical acts. A brain is what? An arbitrarily defined collection of p...
11 comments:

The authoritarianism of science education

›
Science education is NOT an example of following the argument where it leads. If you do a chem lab and your results differ from those pre...
1 comment:
Monday, August 07, 2017

The Bible as a moral guide

›
The problem with the Bible as a moral guide is that the Bible is addressed to social situations which change. Just one example, given what ...
4 comments:

Wielenberg, causal efficacy, and the moral argument for God

›
 Erik Wielenberg defends a robust moral realism compatible with atheism. However, for him, moral duties are causally inert. Since I was tal...
11 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Victor Reppert
I am the author of C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason, published by Inter-Varsity Press. I received a Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1989.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.