dangerous idea

This is a blog to discuss philosophy, chess, politics, C. S. Lewis, or whatever it is that I'm in the mood to discuss.

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

The first part of a critique of Beversluis

›
At the time of this writing, the most comprehensive analysis of C. S. Lewis’s Christian apologetics from a philosophical perspective is John...
1 comment:

A new blog entitled Energies of the Trinity

›
Hat Tip: Perry Robinson.
Monday, January 30, 2006

A radio discussion of the argument from reason

›
Kenneth Samples presents and defends the Argument from Reason on this Reasons to believe broadcast. Go under 1-17 and click on the link to ...
1 comment:

Were our ancestors flat-earthers?

›
Hint: No.
4 comments:

Loftus and the fallacy of chronological snobbery

›
This post, from John Loftus. seems to me to commit the fallacy of chronological snobbery, as described by C. S. Lewis in Surprised by Joy. H...
2 comments:
Saturday, January 28, 2006

The Argument from Desire

›
This is Peter Kreeft's defense of the Argument from Desire. This post received a belated comment from Steve Lovell, so I am redating it ...
9 comments:

Mere Christianity Book III Chapter 4

›
Mere Christianity Book III Chapter 4 Morality and Psychoanalysis Psychoanalysis is the psychological technique invented by Sigmund Freud Whe...
5 comments:
Thursday, January 26, 2006

Patrick Reardon's Critique of Materialism

›
Hat tip: Rob Grano
7 comments:

A Reply to John Loftus

›
Loftus comments can be found here: http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/01/what-motivates-atheist-to-be-good.html John: I'd ve...
18 comments:

Mattill on Jesus and Jonah

›
The following is from A. J. Mattill's critique of Lewis's Modern Theology and Biblical Criticisms. My replies are below. I. Distrust...
2 comments:
Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Calvani responds to the comments

›
I had asked David Calvani what he thought of the comments on the entry that I had posted from him concerning the establishment clause. Victo...
3 comments:

Phil Steiger on ID and explanation

›
This is an interesting discussion of the claim that design is explanatorily empty.
Monday, January 23, 2006

A question from Joe Markus on Michael Martin

›
Hello Professor Reppert,   I recently came across some posts involving the notions of necessity and possibility on William Vallicella's ...
3 comments:

Does Neuroscience solve all the problems in the philosophy of mind?

›
Apparently not, according to Jaegwon Kim, in an interview for ephilosopher. Hat tip: Joe Markus.   "Jaegwon Kim: Some philosophers come...
1 comment:

On the fawning C. S. Lewis fan club

›
Ed Babinski: Though I do disagree with you and others who appear sometimes to be fawning at C. S. Lewis's feet over his ability to argue...
1 comment:

Blomberg's Critique of the Da Vinci Cole

›
2 comments:

An article by Matt Kaufman on Arrogance (and immaturity) in academia

›
The Darwinist's Blinders  by Matt Kaufman  "This will be a nice slap in their big fat face." The words sound like something yo...
2 comments:
Saturday, January 21, 2006

Mere Christianity Book III Chapter 2-3

›
Mere Christianity Book II Chapter 2 The “Cardinal” Virtues Traditional Christian moral philosophy taught that there were seven virtues: the ...
1 comment:
Friday, January 20, 2006

Gore's speech

›
This is the text of Gore's speech. If you disagree with it, please don't use Alberto Gonzales' tu quoque argument that the Clint...
1 comment:

John Loftus' new blog

›
John Loftus wrote: I just started a blog and I was wondering if you would mind if I placed your blog as one of my links? I don't suppos...
3 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Victor Reppert
I am the author of C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason, published by Inter-Varsity Press. I received a Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1989.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.