Yep, infanticide has its defenders.
This is a blog to discuss philosophy, chess, politics, C. S. Lewis, or whatever it is that I'm in the mood to discuss.
Monday, April 07, 2025
AI on whether abortion is cheaper
Of course you also have the argument that capital punishment is cheaper.
While the costs of abortion and childbirth vary, some argue that the long-term costs to the state of raising a child are greater than the costs of providing abortion care, potentially leading to a situation where abortion is cheaper for the state than live birth. [1, 2, 3]
- Long-Term Costs of Raising a Child: The costs associated with raising a child, including education, healthcare, housing, and social services, are significantly higher than the costs of an abortion procedure. [1, 3]
- Medicaid Costs: In states where Medicaid covers abortion, the cost of the procedure is often lower than the cost of providing prenatal care, childbirth, and postpartum care for a live birth. [3, 4]
- Reduced Strain on Social Services: By choosing abortion, individuals may avoid the potential strain on social services that can arise from raising a child, such as childcare, welfare, and education programs. [3]
- Abortion Costs Vary: The cost of an abortion can vary greatly depending on the type of procedure, the stage of pregnancy, and the location of the provider. [5, 6, 7]
- Post-Abortion Care: There can be costs associated with post-abortion care, such as medication, follow-up appointments, and potential complications. [8]
- Ethical Considerations: Some people have strong moral or religious beliefs that abortion is never justifiable, regardless of the costs. [1]
- Mental Health Concerns: Some studies suggest that women who have abortions may experience increased risks of mental health problems, which could lead to increased healthcare costs. [9]
- State-Specific Laws and Regulations: Abortion laws and regulations vary by state, which can impact the cost and accessibility of abortion care. [4, 10]
- Insurance Coverage: Some health insurance plans may not cover abortion services, which can lead to higher out-of-pocket costs. [4, 11]
- Access to Abortion Care: In some areas, access to abortion care is limited, which can increase the cost and difficulty of obtaining an abortion. [12]
- The Hyde Amendment: The Hyde Amendment, which restricts the use of federal Medicaid funds for abortion, can lead to higher costs for individuals seeking abortion care. [4, 13]
- Abortion Funds: Organizations like the National Network of Abortion Funds help cover the costs of abortion for those who cannot afford it. [5, 12]
Thursday, April 03, 2025
If materialism true, how is belief based on evidence possible?
The title of
one of Richard Dawkins’s books is The
Blind Watchmaker, but its subtitle is How
the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a World without Design.1 The
subtitle, it seems to me, makes a paradoxical claim. On the one hand, it
maintains we ought to draw the conclusion that the world lacks design. On the
other hand, the subtitle suggests that he has reached this conclusion through
examining the evidence of evolution, but examining the evidence is a process designed to discover the truth. In fact,
Dawkins is fond of contrasting his own methods for reaching conclusions with
methods based on faith, which to his mind involve a lack of design. He put it
this way in an open letter to his ten-year-old daughter:
Next time somebody tells you
something that sounds important, think to yourself: ‘Is this the kind of thing
that people probably know because of evidence? Or is it the kind of thing that
people only believe because of tradition, authority or revelation?’ And, next
time somebody tells you that something is true, why not say to them: ‘What kind
of evidence is there for that?’ And if they can’t give you a good answer, I
hope you’ll think very carefully before you believe a word they say.2
Dawkins appeals to a fact of experience, one
that cannot be denied without extreme implausibility. There are some claims
that can be justified only if there is evidence for it, and we form our beliefs
concerning them based on the evidence. If we want to know whether or not the
Loch Ness Monster exists, we have to look at the evidence for or against it.
Someone could have a strong feeling about it, but that wouldn’t be a reason to
believe that the monster exists, or that it does not exist. But if the world
really is without design, how is this possible that anyone can reason to a
conclusion? Of course, it could turn out that the paradox is resolvable. Still,
if the world is not teleological, those who think they
believe anything for a good reason owe us an explanation as to how that is even
possible.