dangerous idea

This is a blog to discuss philosophy, chess, politics, C. S. Lewis, or whatever it is that I'm in the mood to discuss.

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Reply to Parsons in the explanation of religious belief

›
Keith Parsons replied to my genetic fallacy discussion on the Secular Outpost. Vic, thanks loads for your reply. I do not think that we have...
22 comments:

Fox will do third Narnia film

›
Disney out, Fox in for Narnia.

Some Salsa That Will Put You In Touch With the Divine

›
A little bit of this on your Mexican food and you'll start seeing Jesus in your burritos.

From Norwood Russell Hanson's What I Don't Believe

›
Instead of spelling galaxies, how about this one? I changed the name at the end, however. Suppose . . . that on next Tuesday morning, just a...
3 comments:
Friday, January 30, 2009

The case for moral objectivity

›
A redated post. I. The argument from Implied Practice 1. If ethics is subjective, then we should expect people to recognize that actions whi...
19 comments:

John Depoe's argument against materialism

›
An interesting development of the AFR by a much-missed former denizen of the blogosphere.
11 comments:
Thursday, January 29, 2009

Ayer's ethical emotivism

›
A link discussing A. J. Ayer's emotive theory of ethics.
9 comments:

A 2008 edition of the Lexicon

›
Daniel Dennett's greatest work.
1 comment:

What do we mean by faith? And Where does it come in?

›
Without a clear idea of what we mean by faith, it could be all sorts of different things. Does faith mean belief absent any evidence, or bel...
13 comments:
Monday, January 26, 2009

Against attempts to reconcile science and religion

›
By Jerry Coyne. HT: Eric Koski.
11 comments:

Kant's moral argument for God

›
A redated post. The link it to a philosophy of religion information site. Suppose you have been trying to decide whether to believe in God o...
12 comments:

Ross Douthat on the Teapot Analogy

›
HT: Matt Jordan
2 comments:

Is Christian apologetics inherently dishonest?

›
A redated post. This links to a Debunking Christianity post. I suppose there are some Christian apologists who calculate the apologetic impa...
10 comments:

Atheism and devotion

›
Can you be an atheist without devoting yourself to atheism in any way? Some people, like Dawkins, are really dedicated to atheism. They put ...
4 comments:

The Modest Trilemma

›
Very often the Trilemma argument is treated as a proof of Jesus's divinity. I'd like to see how far it can go, not as a proof of Jes...
1 comment:

Brandon on the Burden of Proof

›
Is there a burden of proof? Brandon seems to think there is no general burden of proof that could support, for example, the claim that athei...
2 comments:
Saturday, January 24, 2009

A response to godless Christianity

›
Where does the information about Christ come from? From a source that says he walked on water, taught on his own authority (even exalting hi...
5 comments:

Can you oppose Roe without affirming the rights of the fetus?

›
Let's try the following to help clarify things. Do you think that it would be an Constitutionally unacceptable violation of privacy if t...

The Source for the Qu'ran

›
2 comments:
Thursday, January 22, 2009

Strict Constructionism would not have freed Dred Scott

›
According to this. It seems clearly right that the constitution did not affirm the right of a Negro slave to liberty. If it had, the Souther...
7 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Victor Reppert
I am the author of C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason, published by Inter-Varsity Press. I received a Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1989.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.