dangerous idea

Jim Lippard wrote: I don't think you can reasonably question the coherence and adequacy of those intertheoretic reductions without learn...

This is a very old (as blog posts go) post from Bill Vallicella against the claim that the laws of logic are empirical generalizations. It s...

An interview with Ron Sider.

Naturalists and supernaturalists agree that we do engage in rational inferences. The supernaturalists think we do so using magical non-physi...

There was a discussion of the use of neurophysiology to disconfirm survival on this blog last June, (see link) and I got this response from...

Some responses to Lippard. His comments are in bold, mine are not. The conclusion that rationality is *undermined* doesn't follow--at be...

This is response from Jim Lippard to the argument from reason. The Lippard Blog: Minds, brains, and rationality

LEGAL EXPERTS ANALYZE THE IMPACT OF THE DOVER INTELLIGENT DESIGN TRIAL DECISION IN THE NEW BOOK, “TRAIPSING INTO EVOLUTION” Traipsing Into E...

I am reposting the link to Lewis's voice, in case you missed it.

A University of Kentucky philosopher of science challenges the reasoning in the dover decision. IS INTELLIGENT DESIGN SCIENCE? DISSECTING TH...

I would just like to point out that for the most part the discussion that developed in this discussion is not exactly germane to the point I...

Victor: You say in footnote #21 of your article "The Lewis-Anscombe Controversy" that a necessary condition for rationality to exi...

This is a discussion on Tom Gilson's Thinking Christian blog.

At the box office for 2005.

Dear Dr. Reppert, I am a grad student at Texas Tech and very interested in Lewis's AFR and your versions of it. I am writing a paper an...

This is a review of Jaegwon Kim's Physicalism or Something Near Enough on David Chalmers' philosophy of mind blog.