dangerous idea

This is a blog to discuss philosophy, chess, politics, C. S. Lewis, or whatever it is that I'm in the mood to discuss.

Saturday, October 29, 2005

An attack on Lewis from Austin Cline

›
These comments are from Austin Cline, on his atheism website. He seems a little out of touch with the most recent scholarship on the Argumen...
5 comments:
Wednesday, October 26, 2005

A note from Matt Jordan

›
Matt Jordan wrote: So we're not meeting for the philosophy group right now. But I can still pontificate at you, can't I? I'm T...
1 comment:

A couple more references on the argument from desire

›
I'm going to be attending more to the Argument from Desire in the future. Also see this from John DePoe . http://apologetics.johndepoe.c...
Tuesday, October 25, 2005

In Defense of Natural Theology

›
Doug Groothuis, one of the co-editors of the book, has a blog entry about the new book on natural theology. As you can see, I have an essay ...
1 comment:
Thursday, October 20, 2005

New book on Lewis's moral argument

›
This is a new book on Lewis's moral argument. It should be interesting.
1 comment:

A note from Don Jones on Bahnsen

›
This is rather belated, since I got this last September 21. However, I do have a thing or two to say in response: Professor Reppert, I reall...
15 comments:

A New York Times article on science and religion

›
Hat tip: amstar Agreeing Only to Disagree on God's Place in Science By GEORGE JOHNSON Published: September 27, 2005 It was on the second...
1 comment:
Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Plantinga's argument from evil for theism

›
This is also from the essay "A Christian Life Partly Lived," from IVP's Philosophers who Believe. Second, it is indeed true th...
2 comments:

Robert Price's critique of Craig

›
This is Robert Price's critique of Craig on the resurrection. Ad hominem perhaps?
2 comments:

Aristotle, Bush, Rational Inference, and Richard Carrier

›
This is an old post that I am bringing up to the present. Jason in his comment on a previous entry says that Carrier is making a mistake whe...
5 comments:
Thursday, October 13, 2005

Fundamentalism as an intellectual vice

›
Frank Walton wrote: With all due respect, Victor, I think you're exhibiting an attitude that comes close to fundamentalism itself: Lewis...
4 comments:

Reductio ad absurdum versions of the argument from evil

›
Earlier I posed the question of whether a naturalist could use the argument from evil, if that naturalist was not a moral realist. Some comm...
3 comments:

Moreland's review of Kim

›
Bill Vallicella has a link to J. P. Moreland's review of Jaegwon's Kim's Physicalism or something near enough.
Wednesday, October 12, 2005

A little fun at my own expense

›
A long time ago I came up with an entry to the philosopher's lexicon on myself. reppert v. To enhance the reputation of a popular apolog...
1 comment:
Monday, October 10, 2005

Moral Realism and the Problem of Evil

›
Here is that version of the problem of evil again: (1) Gratuitous evils probably exist. (2) Gratuitous evils are incompatible with the God o...
20 comments:

No true Scotsman

›
Antony Flew used to be fond of this example: A: No true Scotsman puts sugar in his porridge. B. But what about Mr. Campbell here. He's a...
8 comments:
Thursday, October 06, 2005

I made it into the Wikipedia

›
See the entry on naturalism in the Wikipedia.

Peter S Williams' blog

›
This is Peter S. Williams blog on ID. Victor
1 comment:

A Catholic Cardinal on Darwin and design

›
Op-Ed Contributor Finding Design in Nature E-Mail This Printer-Friendly Save Article By CHRISTOPH SCHĂ–NBORN Published: July 7, ...
1 comment:

A paper Russell Howell presented at the Lewis conference

›
This is an interesting offshoot of the argument from reason.
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Victor Reppert
I am the author of C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason, published by Inter-Varsity Press. I received a Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1989.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.