dangerous idea

Here.

Here.  We will not pursue that dispute here except to note that even if the case is made that ID could not count as proper science, which ...

The decision by Judge Jones excluding intelligent design from public education has been lauded by defenders of evolution, including atheist...

Jerry Coyne thinks so. In a funny sort of way, these sorts of statements support one of the claims made by ID supporters. For example, th...

This is a definition of intelligent design by Jay Richards of Discovery Institute. ID proponents argue, on the basis of public evidence, d...

Here. I really think the ID message is getting skewed, partly, by the debate about public education. Still, the attempt to suppress discus...

Doctor Logic: If an all powerful being were designing life, we don't expect descent, common descent, common composition or a gradual app...

"I look at the term 'species' as one arbitrarily given, for the sake of convenience, to a set of individuals closely resembling...

This is by Douglas Axe.

Jay Richards delineates six definitions of evolution. Can a Christian accept all six? Should a Christian do so

I have a contribution in this Discovery Institute volume, which is another presentation of the AFR.

Here is a discussion of Jerry Coyne's reply to Nagel. He considers it outrageous that an atheist would admit any legitimacy whatsover to...

A redated post.  This is a paper by Robin Collins, who seems sympathetic to the overall goals of ID but does not consider it to be a scie...

It seems to me that if there were an intelligent agent guiding evolution, it would be one whose activity was less predictable and less tract...

This is a redated post. Way back then, the judge decided he had to define science. This seems to have happened all over again. This is the...

In order to understand what the supernatural is, we need to understand what it is to be natural. I have developed a definition of what is na...

Bradley Monton is an interesting philosopher, an atheist who is opposed to the witch-hunt against Intelligent Design. I would put atheists...

Michael Peterson argues that he would not.

Why is the multiverse theory science, and ID not science? Can we appeal to the unobserved and unobservable, so long as it's not personal...