dangerous idea

Here .

This is a discussion in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy on the meaning of life. Some, like Craig, argue that life is absurd and m...

On Reasons to Believe. Here.

I have some questions about Craig's "Holy Spirit Epistemology," which may not be quite the typical ones. The picture that we...

In any event, Dawkins' failure to debate Craig is not something I have a problem with per se. However, I find the charge of "defe...

Here.  Why? Because he keeps hoping to see some real arguments. What I was wholly unprepared for, however, was the way in which the Ath...

I'm not a defender of Craig's epistemology. I'm against using Craig's Holy Spirit Epistemology against him when he's pre...

A redated post. William Lane Craig has been criticized for using the inner testimony of the Holy Spirit in a way that parallels what I hav...

There are two sets of evidence that Christians appeal to argue that Christianity is divine rather than human in origin. First, there was the...

This debate really did take place. Thrasymachus has mapped the debate at the title's link.

Actually, it's Craig that is ducking, according to Paul Manata.

I disagree pretty strongly with Craig's way of defending such things as the ban on the Amalekites. At the same time, if I refused to eng...

To hear Dawkins' talk, it sounds as if he's refusing to debate Craig because he holds an evil position, on killing the Canaanites. ...

Now it's not about resumes, it's about genocide.

From William Lane Craig's calendar.  Tuesday 25th October 2011 7.30pm  Lecture " Is God a Delusion? " A Critique of Dawkins...

This post, from Siris, argues that St. Thomas Aquinas provided the basis for rejecting versions of the Kalam Cosmological Argument that appe...

This, I think, illustrates the weakness of the debate format.

An area in which he has been often criticized.

Please take note, especially, of the ad hominem attacks on William Lane Craig mentioned here.

Bill Craig thinks it does.