Showing posts with label Keith Parsons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keith Parsons. Show all posts
Thursday, June 07, 2012

Dialogue with Keith Parsons on loving bad people

›
Parsons: A further issue I have always had with Christianity is the one you express as follows: "Christians are enjoined by their fai...
28 comments:
Thursday, March 08, 2012

Don Macintosh replies to Parsons on Miracles

›
1 comment:
Sunday, November 27, 2011

This is Parsons' critique of Kreeft and Tacelli on hallucinations

›
It is online.
116 comments:
Friday, November 04, 2011

The Best Skeptical Response to Resurrection Apologetics

›
There are two sets of evidence that Christians appeal to argue that Christianity is divine rather than human in origin. First, there was the...
212 comments:
Saturday, August 13, 2011

An Old Exchange between Keith Parsons and myself over theistic explanations

›
This is one that appears in my paper on Hume on Miracles, Frequencies and Prior Probabilities.  Science is unavoidably naturalistic, or at...
6 comments:
Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Parsons on Mental Causation

›
The Secular Outpost: The Problem with Metaphysical Naturalism (According to Victor Reppert) First, I do share Parsons' concern about g...
32 comments:
Friday, April 01, 2011

Some exchange with Keith Parsons

›
KP : Honestly, I do not know what to make of your suggestion that souls and gods might turn out to be natural entities. “Natural” and “su...
9 comments:
Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Why the Moon Isn't Made of Green Cheese: Uncommon Descent on Parsons and Herrick

›
Herrick has responded to Keith Parsons' Secular Web essay . HT: Steve Hays.
2 comments:
Saturday, December 18, 2010

Was the Resurrection an Extraordinary Claim?

›
Keith: Let me try a deliberately "naive" response to ECREE and the Resurrection, to see what you think. How extraordinary was the ...
44 comments:
Friday, December 10, 2010

Keith Parsons replies to McInerny

›
Here is Parsons' reply to McInerny, as promised.
1 comment:
Thursday, December 02, 2010

Reply to Parsons on the Spelling Bees, Theories, and Explanations

›
Keith Parsons responds to the Spelling Bee incident:  Am I skeptical of Victor's report? No. Why should I be? People frequently think...
52 comments:
Wednesday, September 08, 2010

The Prosblogion entry on atheist burnout

›
Knowing both Parsons and Beversluis, (Parsons through having lived in a house with him when we were both seminary students in the late 70s, ...
42 comments:
Saturday, October 24, 2009

On Skinning Cats: Keith Parsons on Human Depravity as the Best Argument for Christianity

›
G. K. Chesterton called original sin the only part of Christian theology which can really be proved.  Certain new theologians dispute orig...
1 comment:
Thursday, June 18, 2009

Keith Parsons' evidential argument from evil

›
A redated post. Suppose we are all tenants in a large apartment building and we meet to discuss common problems. It is clear that the buildi...
12 comments:
Monday, June 15, 2009

Keith Parsons reviews Ruse's Can a Darwinist Be A Christian

›
A redated post.
2 comments:
Saturday, May 30, 2009

Craig on the absurdity of life without God

›
And this is Parsons' rebuttal.
49 comments:
Monday, May 18, 2009

Craig and Parsons on the Resurrection

›
Here is Craig's defense of the resurrection. The link from the title is to Parsons' rebuttal.
1 comment:
Tuesday, May 12, 2009

A Defense of Theism against an argument of Parsons'

›
Keith Parsons argues from the success of science to the probable nonexistence of God. Paul Herrick disputes this argument. The Secular Web c...
8 comments:
Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Keith Parsons' critique of the argument from common consent

›
Thursday, February 05, 2009

Meaning of life apologetics and the Keith Parsons rebuttal

›
Here is an account of a new debate by Bill Craig in Canada. One thing to notice about this debate, however, is that Craig is defending a pro...
20 comments: