tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post8614503389605911405..comments2024-03-28T12:34:14.649-07:00Comments on dangerous idea: Steve responds to my paradoxVictor Repperthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-61581165707379505802009-04-10T18:04:00.000-07:002009-04-10T18:04:00.000-07:00How, exactly, would would it work out logically th...How, exactly, would would it work out logically that God *could* speak falsely?<BR/><BR/>Are you all forgetting that God isn't Zeus?<BR/><BR/>God (eternally) upholds the existence of all things ... by the power of his word.IlĂonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-29188553689053066212009-04-10T16:23:00.000-07:002009-04-10T16:23:00.000-07:00The Answers in Genesis people think that the Bible...The Answers in Genesis people think that the Bible conveys accurate scientific information, including a recent date for the age of the universe, which can be defended on biblical grounds. There are people still fighting these "science wars."Victor Repperthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-11382915292902949012009-04-10T15:58:00.000-07:002009-04-10T15:58:00.000-07:00I don't see the difficulty in "God's getting his m...I don't see the difficulty in "God's getting his message across to prescientific peoples." For one thing, nobody believes the Bible is a textbook of science. Second, prescientific people were able to get messages across to each other, even in ways that make sense to us. Also, in many ways, even Darwin would be a prescientific writer by today's standard, having lived before nuclear power, the Internet and Tickle-Me-Elmo.Travis Crollhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12868406912271416535noreply@blogger.com