tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post6677276018811747646..comments2024-03-28T12:34:14.649-07:00Comments on dangerous idea: Two books on revelation Victor Repperthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-7241968744681848752016-03-14T00:56:57.570-07:002016-03-14T00:56:57.570-07:00you didn't talk about Abraham. Billy Abraham i...you didn't talk about Abraham. Billy Abraham is former prof and coffee buddy.<br /><br />I would think before rev could be proof of God, you have to show it is from God. Maybe it could be argued "if there is a God he must have written this.? That's meaningless without some reason why it could not be wrote without God. I really don't see a logical way revelation could be proof of God w/o assuming before hand there is a God.Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.com