tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post2746510698502339393..comments2024-03-28T12:34:14.649-07:00Comments on dangerous idea: The Silence of the RelativistsVictor Repperthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-58154958935557913922019-02-05T02:47:51.388-07:002019-02-05T02:47:51.388-07:00If morals are really subjective, you don't hav...If morals are really subjective, you don't <i>have</i> to say anything. OK, cheap shot, this is not a moral necessity rather a logical one. But can't the subjectivists just say, We will let you have your opinion but we aren't prepared to let you act on it? Must the subjectivist refer to something outside himself to justify this? He just wants to live free of fear of being eaten by his fellows. It's as if the moral response is independent of any theory as to the nature and origin of morals. And maybe that's not such a bad thing.David Brightlyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06757969974801621186noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-49317334654697862962019-01-28T16:27:12.996-07:002019-01-28T16:27:12.996-07:00I just got it. The Silence of the Relativists!
&...I just got it. <i>The Silence of the Relativists!</i><br /><br />"I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti.” <br /><br />Haha!<br /><br />Victor, <br /><br />You should have made it a little more obvious to people like me who are a little slow!bmillerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05855545675821692382noreply@blogger.com