Actually deductive arguments does not need to be based on facts. It just has to he structured in such a way that if the premises are true, the conclusion must be. For example, it is a valid deductive argument to say "Abortion is murder, murder should be legal, therefore abortion should be legal." However it' going to be tough selling people on the second premise.
5 comments:
Every aspect of reality consists only of fundamental matter. Fundamental matter exists objectively. Halluncinations are an aspect of reality, one example being unicorns. Therefore unicorns exist objectively as fundamental matter.
Why eliminative materialism makes no sense.
Since we're discussing bad arguments, here's the latest post from VD on AI's enlightenment regarding the argument for evolution by natural selection. It won't be long before censors have to step in and tweak the algorithm in order to save the theory.
https://voxday.net/2025/05/27/ai-rejects-evolution/
Why eliminative materialism makes no sense.
Making sense is an illusion. So there!
At base, everything is an illusion therefore all illusions are illusions existing as fundamental matter. You lose! Good day!
Dream on.
Post a Comment