tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post817307003390792993..comments2024-03-28T12:34:14.649-07:00Comments on dangerous idea: Is this a pro-life alternative to eliminating choice? Victor Repperthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-64595498088072262192018-07-29T08:01:44.026-07:002018-07-29T08:01:44.026-07:00I can see reasons why the left and right would com...I can see reasons why the left and right would complain about this. The far right would call all this government involvement socialism. The far left might complain that this promotes a heteronormative view of why a family should be.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01944050741070397230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-89996206722725858642018-07-28T13:49:49.585-07:002018-07-28T13:49:49.585-07:00Absolutely the government and society have a veste...Absolutely the government and society have a vested interest in promoting families. There should truly be benefits and motivators to having a stable family.<br /><br />Also, a much more descriptive title would be "Is this a pro-life alternative to eliminating the legal ability to butcher the unborn?"Kevinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02593005679430527458noreply@blogger.com