tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post7415620111093569007..comments2024-03-28T12:34:14.649-07:00Comments on dangerous idea: Chronological snobbery once againVictor Repperthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-33199485824756522782016-11-30T10:29:08.393-07:002016-11-30T10:29:08.393-07:00Of course the opposite is also a fallacy: just bec...Of course the opposite is also a fallacy: just because something is new does not make it bad and just because something is old does not make it good.jdhueyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14548783175350394626noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-67067710084518986362016-11-30T02:18:45.939-07:002016-11-30T02:18:45.939-07:00one example is the preference for physical over sp...one example is the preference for physical over spiritualistic solutions are primitive and must be wrong. Bede Rundle's arguments for the necessity of matter (but not of God) in Why there is something rather than nothing are an example.<br /><br /><a href="http://metacrock.blogspot.com/2016/11/what-something-answering-bede-rundles.html" rel="nofollow"><b>Here is my answer to Rundle's argument</b></a>Joseph Hinman (Metacrock)https://www.blogger.com/profile/06957529748541493998noreply@blogger.com