tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post1742835617249327914..comments2024-03-28T11:15:16.747-07:00Comments on dangerous idea: On being judgmentalVictor Repperthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10962948073162156902noreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-76813420321436062322022-04-07T05:50:29.425-07:002022-04-07T05:50:29.425-07:00هومير البورصة لديهم قدرة على التحكم في حالة سوق ال...<a href="https://aswaqdaily.com/%D9%87%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B5%D8%A9/" rel="nofollow">هومير البورصة</a> لديهم قدرة على التحكم في حالة سوق المال والأسهم عن طريق الخبرة في المضاربة، وعادة ما يظهر ذلك الأمر بوضوح في أسواق المال الخليجية والعربية على وجه العموم، فالأمر يتعلق بشكل كبير بكون حصول هوامير التداول الكبار على الملايين في محافظهم المالية.Mahmoud Aminhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05737435463099410903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-88744298372127092442022-01-22T19:59:35.226-07:002022-01-22T19:59:35.226-07:00Your property professionally washed by a great exp...Your property professionally washed by a great expert company can save you time so you can very easily do the things you love. When you have trouble with the language of the customers, personnel, and suppliers your firm will be percieved while unprofessional and there is going to be poor communications amongst you. You can expect you with good<br /> <a href="https://etf-lab.com/cleaning-company-in-riyadh/" rel="nofollow">شركة تنظيف بالرياض عمالة فلبينية</a><br /><a href="https://etf-lab.com/" rel="nofollow">تنظيف منازل بالرياض</a><br /><a href="https://etf-lab.com/apartments-cleaning-in-riyadh/" rel="nofollow">شركة تنظيف شقق</a><br /><br />cleaning services in temples or wats through our knowledgeable personnel and mechanical strategies. Our friendly, professional skin cleansers are all trained, dependable, referenced, insured and dependable. Normally, once I received right into a home on the initial visit it requires 6-8 hours to obtain it the way We like it-very clean.<a href="https://etf-lab.com/%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%83%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%D9%8A%D9%81-%D9%81%D9%84%D9%84-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6/" rel="nofollow">تنظيف فلل بالرياض</a><br /><a href="https://etf-lab.com/%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%D9%8A%D9%81-%D8%AE%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6/" rel="nofollow">تنظيف خزانات بالرياض</a><br /><a href="https://etf-lab.com/air-conditioning-cleaning-riyadh/" rel="nofollow">تنظيف مكيفات بالرياض</a><br /><br /> <br />95% of what you shell out out goes straight to the worker cooperative organization. Most products perform a lot even more than just vacuuming, cleaning or perhaps scrubbing. Comes biweekly so my home is well maintained thus she noesn't need to dedicate many hours when the lady comes back. If the carpet cleaning experience hasn't functioned away for you, therefore come to be described as a harvested up and find other people, get one of these kinds of different company, or perhaps merely associated with time to accomplish it yourself<a href="https://etf-lab.com/cleaning-carpets-and-moquette-in-riyadh/" rel="nofollow">تنظيف سجاد بالرياض</a><br /><a href="https://etf-lab.com/%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%83%D8%A9-%D8%AC%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%A8%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B7-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6/" rel="nofollow">جلي بلاط بالرياض</a><br /><a href="https://etf-lab.com/water-leak-detection-in-riyadh/" rel="nofollow">كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض</a>elrahmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14712093218329885444noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-82373342390714822992021-10-27T11:52:34.673-07:002021-10-27T11:52:34.673-07:00حسنًا ، كيف تهتم بسيارتك في الوقت العادي؟ ما رأيك ...<br />حسنًا ، كيف تهتم بسيارتك في الوقت العادي؟ ما رأيك هو أفضل طريقة للحفاظ على سيارتك في رعاية ناجحة؟ في الواقع ، هناك العديد من أساسيات صيانة السيارات التي يجب عليك القيام بها إذا كنت ترغب في إطالة عمر سيارتك. يجب عليك قراءة دليل مالك السيارة لأنه يحتوي على جميع المعلومات المتعلقة بصيانة السيارة بالإضافة إلى احتياطات السلامة. سيكون من الأفضل الحفاظ على جميع السوائل مثل زيت المحرك ، سائل ناقل الحركة ، وسائل التبريد نظيفة ومعبأة.<br /><br /><br />عندما يتعلق الأمر بطلاء السيارة ، فإليك بعض النصائح المفيدة حول إصلاح طلاء السيارات بشكل احترافي للرجوع إليها. تستغرق عملية طلاء سيارتك وقتًا طويلاً ، لذا خصص بضعة أيام أو بضعة عطلات نهاية الأسبوع. من الأفضل استخدام سقيفة لتجنب العناصر ، ولكن يمكن القيام بذلك في الخارج إذا سمح الطقس بذلك وباستخدام احتياطات معينة.<br /><br />ستحتاج إلى بعض أدوات العناية بالسيارات مثل ورق الصنفرة المبلل والجاف ، وآلة صنفرة تعمل بالكهرباء أو بالهواء ، وشريط لاصق ، وصحف لإخفاء القناع ، وضاغط هواء ومسدس رش ، ومخفف ، ومخففات الطلاء ، وأقنعة الوجه ، والسلامة أكواب ، وطبقة تحتية ، وطلاء أكريليك أو طلاء علوي ، وطلاء شفاف. يساعد شفاط الغبار ، رغم أنه ليس ضروريًا ، في الحفاظ على نظافة المنطقة.<br /><br />التحضير الذي عليك القيام به هو تنظيف منطقة العمل الخاصة بك لإزالة الغبار. إذا كنت تقوم بالرش بالخارج ، فقم بغسل المنطقة بالخرطوم وتأكد من أنك لا ترسم تحت الأشجار أو أي شيء آخر من شأنه أن يسقط الملوثات على الطلاء الرطب. ثم اغسل السيارة ونظف السطح من أي أوساخ أو شحوم أو وسخ الطريق. قرر ما إذا كنت تريد الطلاء سيضيف الوقت بشكل كبير إلى الوظيفة لأنك ستحتاج إلى تجريد السيارة من غلافها المكشوف ، بما في ذلك إزالة المحرك.<br /><br />وظيفة الرسم:<br /><br />اختر لون الطلاء المفضل لديك: تأكد من أن هذا اللون هو الأنسب لسيارتك. تحقق من الحاجز للعثور على رقم كود الطلاء. جدار الحماية هو قطعة من الصفائح المعدنية التي تفصل المحرك الموجود أسفل الغطاء عن الركاب داخل السيارة.<br />يجب عليك تنظيف كل الصدأ مسبقًا: افحص المنطقة المصابة بحثًا عن الصدأ. ضع كمية صغيرة من مانع الصدأ على المنطقة المتكسرة قبل لمسها لمنع الصدأ من الانتشار تحت وظيفة اللمسة الخاصة بك. اغسل السيارة ، مع التركيز على المنطقة التي يتكسر فيها الطلاء.<br />يعد وضع مزيل الشمع على المنطقة أفضل خيار: استخدم أداة صنفرة النك لإزالة كل الدهانات السائبة من المنطقة. قم بصقل المنطقة مرة أخرى بورق صنفرة رقم 220. سيسمح هذا للبرايمر بالالتصاق. اغسل المنطقة مرة أخرى بالماء لإزالة الشمع وأي بقايا متبقية من عملية المعالجة المسبقة. اترك المنطقة تجف تمامًا قبل الانتقال إلى الخطوة التالية.<br />ضعي البرايمر إذا لزم الأمر: ضعي القليل من البرايمر على المنطقة إذا وصلت الرقاقة إلى المعدن. إذا كانت الشريحة على مستوى السطح ، فيمكنك تخطي هذه الخطوة. التمهيدي ضروري للرقائق العميقة لأن الطلاء العادي لن يلتصق بالمعدن العاري. انشر البرايمر حول الرقاقة الصغيرة بفرشاة صغيرة. استخدم فقط ما يكفي من البرايمر لطبقة رقيقة واحدة. اتركي البرايمر يجف تمامًا.<br />اختبار الطلاء: ضع بعض الطلاء على منطقة غير مرئية في السيارة ، مثل الشفة الموجودة أسفل الباب. من المهم التأكد من أن الطلاء الذي اشتريته لن يتفاعل بشكل سيء مع الطلاء الحالي وأنه يتطابق أيضًا بشكل جيد. هز الطلاء جيدًا وصب القليل منه في طبق ضحل.<br />قم بإنهاء السطح وتلميع وتلميع السيارة بالكامل. استخدم مقياس ضغط الإطارات للتحقق من المشكلة. اطلب فحص سيارتك مرة واحدة في العام على الأقل في مرآب لتصليح السيارات. مع هذه الممارسة ، فإن الرضا الذي تحصل عليه من القيام بذلك بنفسك يستحق الجهد ، والمال الذي ستوفره سيذهلك. إنها ممارسة مفيدة تستحق أن تجربها.<br /><br /><br /><a href="https://arabaso.com/%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%83%D8%B2-%D8%B5%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%B3-%D8%A8%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6/" rel="nofollow">صيانة مرسيدس</a><br /><br /><a href="https://arabaso.com/%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%B6%D9%84-%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B4%D8%A9-%D8%B5%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AF%D8%A8%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%88-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6/" rel="nofollow">صيانة بي ام دبليو</a><br /><br /><a href="https://arabaso.com/%D8%B5%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%AC-%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%81%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6/" rel="nofollow">صيانة رنج روفر</a><br /><br /><a href="https://arabaso.com/" rel="nofollow">ورشة اصلاح سيارات</a>EL-Nawasanyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12703267514206751441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-32800053443397245612013-04-22T05:14:31.318-07:002013-04-22T05:14:31.318-07:00Allow me to relate a personal anecdote here, which...Allow me to relate a personal anecdote here, which I think is pertinent.<br /><br />A few years ago, I walked into a room in which a TV was on. I looked at the screen and for many long seconds all I could see were random colors that made up no picture. Then all of a sudden, my brain processed the unexpected image it was seeing, and the picture in a flash became clear - it was a bright yellow research submarine hanging from a crane being moved across the interior of a huge building.<br /><br />The complete lack of context and expectations when I entered the room accounted for my brain taking so long to understand what my eyes were seeing. So Ilion is quite right on this one - without context, there is no perception.B. Prokophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10548980245078214688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-39015455912799890962013-04-22T04:57:58.888-07:002013-04-22T04:57:58.888-07:00Hal: "Perceiving something with the senses is...<b>Hal:</b> "<i>Perceiving something with the senses is not the same as perceiving something with the mind alone.</i>"<br /><br />Indeed. For "perceiving something with the mind alone" is more certain -- on top of which, no one can "perceive something with the senses" without having some prior mental framework to provide the <i>context</i> for understanding it. As philosophers and scientists -- in contrast to '<i>Science!</i>' fetishists -- put it, "<i>There is no observation without a theory.</i>"Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-57244190195096445272013-04-21T22:18:06.170-07:002013-04-21T22:18:06.170-07:00Doug
Under intense query, whatever your philosophi...Doug<br />Under intense query, whatever your philosophical stance might have been, latterly your comments have been reduced to Christian apologetical platitudes.<br /><br />Equally, to blithely suggest that one afflicted with multiple personalities, your statement, <i>"Whichever personality happens to be dominant at the time, ...."</i> is perhaps a quite thoughtless, uncaring and off-hand remark about those that suffer the debilitating condition.<br /><br />Both Hal and I-M have picked up on your descent into theology as a substitutionary stand-in for philosophy. The recall of the 'god is being itself' is the option of last resort.Papalintonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03818630173726146048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-29121045468303194652013-04-21T21:50:17.834-07:002013-04-21T21:50:17.834-07:00Doug
"Considering that God is being itself su...Doug<br /><i>"Considering that God is being itself subsisting, the existence of anything at all necessitates God's existence."</i><br /><br />This statement is now universally characterized within philosophy as a 'deepity'. <br />A deepity is something that sounds profound but intellectually hollow.<br /><br />See <a href="http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Deepity" rel="nofollow">HERE</a>. <i>"The term refers to a statement that is apparently profound but actually asserts a triviality on one level and something meaningless on another. Generally, a deepity has (at least) two meanings; one that is true but trivial, and another that sounds profound, but is essentially false or meaningless and would be "earth-shattering" if true."</i>[Wiki}<br /><br />A deepity was originally coined by philosopher Daniel Dennett.<br /><br /><br />Papalintonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03818630173726146048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-86069474273369103042013-04-21T21:13:56.864-07:002013-04-21T21:13:56.864-07:00"God is being itself subsisting"
That&#..."God is being itself subsisting"<br /><br />That's one of the axioms of Thomisitc logic. It's an axiom because it can't be proved logically, but serves as a basis for everything that follows. It's not a truism, because it's not self-evident, and many reasonable people don't buy it. It's just the kool-aid that Thomists drink to justify their belief in the supernatural and all kinds of things. So you buy into the axioms of Thomistic theism, and you are 'justified' in believing whatever logically flows from them. what you don't have is empirical evidence to back up those beliefs.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-3365813263210407372013-04-21T20:59:11.465-07:002013-04-21T20:59:11.465-07:00Doug,
I'm talking about empirical evidence, w...Doug,<br /><br />I'm talking about empirical evidence, which is abundant. I understand that it all comes to me through my senses, and in that respect, there remains some small room for doubt. But I'm not smart enough to invent the whole world and everything in it, especially since there are people out there who are way smarter than me. I place the odds at 'low'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-64830728587456465892013-04-21T20:45:04.052-07:002013-04-21T20:45:04.052-07:00Hal, of course the two have differences. Neverthe...Hal, of course the two have differences. Nevertheless, their similarities are that the skepticism of one implies the skepticism of the other. It doesn't matter if one is perceived with the mind and the other with the senses.<br /><br />Finally, sense-perception does not have a monopoly on objective knowledge. After all, the very claim that things can only be objectively known through sense-perception cannot itself be demonstrated though sense-perception. Verificationism, scientism, and similar isms are all self-defeating, which is why the vast majority of epistemologists reject such presuppositions.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07034462951274070391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-4802927340357698712013-04-21T20:39:56.908-07:002013-04-21T20:39:56.908-07:00Papalinton, multiple personalities doesn't und...Papalinton, multiple personalities doesn't undermine Descartes' cogito ergo sum. Whichever personality happens to be dominant at the time, there is no dominant personality unless there is a mind that possesses it.<br /><br />"I think, therefore God isn't"? Considering that God is being itself subsisting, the existence of anything at all necessitates God's existence.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07034462951274070391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-57050942978605251152013-04-21T20:35:34.724-07:002013-04-21T20:35:34.724-07:00So it's three against one now! :D No worries....So it's three against one now! :D No worries.<br /><br />im-skeptical, what other data do you have in support of an external world other than your perception? As far as additional corroboration goes, if you're just a brain in a vat, then there's not guarantee that that any such corroboration exists. We have no way of proving that anyone other than ourselves exist.<br /><br />For the record, I don't rely upon emotionally-based beliefs, either. That's why I start from a position of skepticism and deduce beliefs that are certain.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07034462951274070391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-45917930384248089382013-04-21T19:08:59.480-07:002013-04-21T19:08:59.480-07:00Doug
'Finally, don't you think "I thi...Doug<br /><i>'Finally, don't you think "I think, therefore I am" is more certain than the New York Giants won the last Superbowl?"</i><br /><br />Yes, but to whom? Descartes truism is not an objective proof of the existence of anything or anyone else. Can the person with multiple personalities [of which there are countless psychiatric cases] be assured and know which one is the real 'them'? The evidence suggests: Hardly. The fact of innumerable clinical examples of multiple personality traits is a clear objective indicator that whatever the mind is, of which each person normally would have but one, but by no means exclusively, the mind is indeed an integral operant constituent of the physical body. Just as evolutionary genetics can generate extra fingers or limbs, or additional rows of teeth, or no ears, or generate separate brains/minds but share a single body, or more rarely, one brain/mind sharing two conjoined but distinct bodies, is pretty near damned concrete evidence that the mind is as much a reality of physical constraints as the materialism of the body.<br /><br />However, there is one thing I can take from Descartes "I think, therefore I am" truism:<br /><br />"I think, therefore God isn't." <br />Papalintonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03818630173726146048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-28041011237729382182013-04-21T18:27:49.467-07:002013-04-21T18:27:49.467-07:00Doug,
I'm not trying to dispute well-accepted...Doug,<br /><br />I'm not trying to dispute well-accepted logical truisms. I do think that all of our beliefs are subject to doubt. I have heard the argument made that if materialism is true, we can't trust the validity of our own rational thinking. That is something I absolutely agree with, but I would hasten to add that it's true whether or not materialism is true. The fact is people believe all kinds of different things, theists and non-theists alike. All those things are not true. So can we trust what our logic tells us? (Lest the theist smugly proclaims "I can", remember that theists hold many divergent beliefs between them.) <br /><br />The fact that we believe so many different things, all based on 'irrefutable' logic, our application of logic seems to lack finality in determining the truth. Note that I'm taking an unbiased stance here. <br /><br />How do we know what is true? I think the best way is to get additional corroboration for what we believe, the more the better. We can't rely on logic alone. Am I a brain in a vat? My logic tell me no, but am I certain? I do know that it's not only my senses that experience the external world - there is plenty of additional information available to me that tends to confirm what I believe - that there is a real world outside my brain.<br /><br />Other beliefs are more difficult to confirm in an empirical way. Then we may need to look to the ideas of others for confirmation. I don't claim that it would prove things, but at least I could have the comfort of knowing that my own ideas are not so outrageous that nobody else shares them. That would certainly be a red flag. Again, this should not be seen as the basis for believing something, but as a way to help confirm a belief, especially if those shared beliefs are well-founded.<br /><br />What I don't trust so much are emotions or feelings to justify my beliefs. That is the basis for a great many beliefs that are clearly false. This is actually something that most people agree with, except when it comes to their own emotionally-based beliefs.<br /><br />Have I addressed the questions?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-80812686822018931152013-04-21T17:51:07.154-07:002013-04-21T17:51:07.154-07:00im-skeptical, I want to ask you this question agai...im-skeptical, I want to ask you this question again because it went unanswered before (not with any malice, of course): if you can doubt the beliefs produced by your mind, can't you also doubt the beliefs that the general populace accepts? What if there aren't any other people? Remember the brain in a vat example?<br /><br />Finally, don't you think "I think, therefore I am" is more certain than the New York Giants won the last Superbowl?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07034462951274070391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-25214154113682888452013-04-21T15:27:26.547-07:002013-04-21T15:27:26.547-07:00Well, it's time to make my weekly migration to...Well, it's time to make my weekly migration to North Canton ... which means that if I post anything before the weekend, it will tend to be a 'snipe'.Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-84053940827525218832013-04-21T15:21:18.010-07:002013-04-21T15:21:18.010-07:00Yes, I have to take that into account when I asses...Yes, I have to take that into account when I assess my own beliefs. I don't accept them uncritically, as most theists throughout history have done. I don't base them on some vague emotional appeal. I need to have good reason, and it certainly helps that there are many others who share that reasoning. I'm not just some irrational lone-wolf who has these bizarre notions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-37038904912162999002013-04-21T15:10:04.195-07:002013-04-21T15:10:04.195-07:00I didn't say it was proof, I asked whether it ...I didn't say it was <i>proof</i>, I asked whether it mattered.B. Prokophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10548980245078214688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-45650263217850739272013-04-21T15:02:52.390-07:002013-04-21T15:02:52.390-07:00Bob, you aren't following my argument. I didn...Bob, you aren't following my argument. I didn't say, and I would never say that general agreement constitutes proof. I didn't day that lack of general agreement constitutes disproof. I said that lack of agreement should cast doubt on your level of certainty. Nothing more.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-12465893908146421082013-04-21T14:48:03.413-07:002013-04-21T14:48:03.413-07:00"general agreement ... I think it matters&quo..."<i>general agreement ... I think it matters</i>"<br /><br />Then would you agree that the fact that an overwhelming percentage of humanity throughout history has professed a belief in God matters?B. Prokophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10548980245078214688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-48000968166756313672013-04-21T14:42:08.458-07:002013-04-21T14:42:08.458-07:00" Moreover, why think general agreement ought..." Moreover, why think general agreement ought to be a criterion for justified belief?"<br /><br />In some cases, I think it matters. If an idea has solid logical proof, then people will agree that it's true. If we're talking about something that is in fact objective, then people will agree. If we're talking about something that is a construct of your mind, and it's you're the only one who believes it, that fact must cast doubt on its truth, no matter how convinced you are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-24147715853592660132013-04-21T14:30:02.661-07:002013-04-21T14:30:02.661-07:00Pinback: All right, bomb. Prepare to receive new o...Pinback: All right, bomb. Prepare to receive new orders.<br />Bomb#20: You are false data.<br />Pinback: Hmmm?<br />Bomb #20: Therefore I shall ignore you.<br />Pinback: Hello... bomb?<br />Bomb #20: False data can act only as a distraction. Therefore, I shall refuse to perceive.<br />Pinback: Hey, bomb?<br />Bomb #20: The only thing that exists is myself.<br />Pinback: Snap out of it, bomb.<br />B. Prokophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10548980245078214688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-75573563637743349982013-04-21T14:26:46.754-07:002013-04-21T14:26:46.754-07:00im-skeptical needs to watch the SF movie Dark Star...im-skeptical needs to watch the SF movie <i>Dark Star</i>, and pay special attention to the ending, where Lt. Doolittle attempts to educate the bomb in phenominology.B. Prokophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10548980245078214688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-24342980015797172013-04-21T13:58:09.547-07:002013-04-21T13:58:09.547-07:00"I think, therefore I am" doesn't ne..."I think, therefore I am" doesn't need any general agreement. Moreover, why think general agreement ought to be a criterion for justified belief?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07034462951274070391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10584495.post-18281120652043218412013-04-21T13:24:33.565-07:002013-04-21T13:24:33.565-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.grodrigueshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12366931909873380710noreply@blogger.com